Issues

Search

Home > Issues > Retrieve

An Analysis of Doses and Images of Mobile CT of High-Energy Electromagnetic Wave Area

Journal of Magnetics, Volume 25, Number 4, 31 Dec 2020, Pages 644-648
Chang Gyu Kim * (Department of Radiological Science, Gimcheon University)
Abstract
The demand in medical field for Mobile Computed Tomography in high-energy electromagnetic area is exploding.
To measure the distribution of exposure doses in abdomen inspection, this study placed 2 glass dosimeter
elements on the entry point and exit point, respectively, 2-3 cm above the navel, the central point of abdominal
inspection, and measured exposure doses in different parts. And, to reduce measurement errors, MDCT
scanning was done 5 times. Acquired images were analyzed qualitatively to identify usefulness in medical
treatment. Qualitative analysis of images was done about image contrast, lesion discovery rate, and clarity of
border. Five specialists (2 medical doctors specializing radiology and 3 radiologists with working experiences
over 10 years) were asked to classify the results on the 5-point scale (1 - very poor; 2 - poor; 3 - average; 4 -
good; 5 - very good). In skull CT scanning, exposure doses measured with glass dosimeter were as follows: 21.4
± 0.43 mGy by 4-MDCT; 13.7 ± 0.43 mGy by 128-MDCT; 5.02 ± 0.19 by Mobile CT, which shows that Mobile
CT requires relatively lower dose to get meaningful images in diagnosis (P < 0.05). In skull CT scanning, the
images acquired from MDCT and Mobile CT were graded on the 5-point Likert scale: 4-MDCT images got
3.50 point; 128-MDCT images got 4.43 point; Mobile CT images got 4.21 point. The 128-MDCT got the highest
point, followed by 4-MDCT and Mobile CT. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The above
findings show that Mobile CT is good for getting high-quality image and reducing radiation exposure doses. It
seems that more hospitals will use Mobile CT.
Keywords: electromagnetic wave; image quality; exposure dose; glass dosimeter; laser element
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2020.25.4.644
Full Text : PDF